Posts Tagged ‘D:F/M’
Faculty Experience Survey – Uh Oh!
Thursday, November 12th, 2009September, Fall Semester ‘09: A Pithy, Early Report
Wednesday, September 30th, 2009Feature writing class has been learning that this instructor’s course  — taught as an in-depth writing course — does not match the description of feature writing described by their basic reporting instructor of spring semester 2009 who told them that a feature story was “light” and that features didn’t use summary news leads. Uh oh!
And D:F/M’s journalism effort is back in the stone age. Should the students be told? Should prospective applicants be warned? Colleagues zonked on Zombie Juice? Uh Oh!
Fall Semester 2009
Sunday, September 13th, 2009A 30-40P Episode Ever There Was One
Friday, May 8th, 2009I came across this student-instructor correspondence [provided later in this post] while searching for other material on my hard drive. The Student-In-Question was an excellent writer as well as considerably bright. He was in his late 20s or early 30s.
In my class, he also was functionally indolent.
I plan to use this anecdote and others for my tome about The Four Barnacles of the Apocalypse.
A Tempest in a Teapot But a Tempest No Less – Part 5
Monday, April 20th, 2009My reply was posted on Hunter L.
Down With Antediluvian Journalism Instruction
Monday, April 20th, 2009In response to a proposal by one of my colleagues about what we in D:F/M call the journalism concentration – his proposal smacks of embarrassing antediluvianism -  I’ve been  psyching myself to write this monster memo about the discombobulation in D:F/M’s journalism effort AKA journalism concentration. Lo’ and behold, the Times publishes this story under the headline: “J Schools Play Catchup.” My first quickie response for j-programs, j-departments and j-concentrations as well as j- schools? The smart ones catch up.
But now, I believe a more pungent response is needed: “Down With Antediluvian Journalism Instruction.”
A Tempest in a Teapot But a Tempest No Less – Part 4
Monday, April 20th, 2009So, I’ve been getting these emails from Adjunct Instructor Cindy Rodriguez, who copies everyone in the department as well as others outside the department, about the anguish she experiences when she reads one of my memos. In one response – copied et al, of course – she suggested that I go file the appropriate complaints with the appropriate bodies and to stop writing acidic memos (which, of course, are based on the complaints filed with the appropriate bodies who either rule in my favor or support my allegations which I believe should be aired) because they pain her so much. She also disapproved of my email about the shortcomings of the Aronson award of which she is associated and so she replied, I guess, to buttress Blanca Vasquez’s cheap shot.
A Tempest in a Teapot But a Tempest No Less – Part 3
Sunday, April 19th, 2009Most Film and Media dept. faculty know that Gregg can raise issues in ways that are contentious.” — Blanca Vasquez, Adjunct Instructor.
My reply was 761 words of pointed insights.
A Tempest in a Teapot Is a Tempest No Less – Part 2
Friday, April 17th, 2009“Hi Aronsonians, I am forwarding a note from Gregg Morris, who teaches journalism at Hunter and who has raised concerns about the Aronson student undergraduate prize. Separating his concerns from how he states them would be a good thing. Most Film and Media dept. faculty know that Gregg can raise issues in ways that are contentious.” [— Blanca Vasquez, Adjunct Instructor]
So, what’s the skinny on this teapot?
(more…)


